On 6 May 2011, at 08:39, Kirk <[email protected]> wrote: > Yup, Jetty is there. But when I did take a look and pretty much everything > else I came up with was an eclipse plug-in of some sort. I've had others > suggest different projects that appeared to be something different but at the > end of the day, what was there was an eclipse plug-in to make it easier to > use said project... which is ok.. It just makes Hudson an odd ball in the > inventory. But then Jetty is there also so...
don't forget Eclipse Orion... http://wiki.eclipse.org/Orion besides, once we finish migrating Hudson core onto OSGi then it too becomes a set of bundles / plug-ins > It's just funny that Jenkins splits from Hudson because Oracle > miscommunicates with the community and then Oracle dumps it into the EF with > no visible consultation with the what was left of the community.... um, the proposal is the start of the consultation - you need an initial proposal for people to discuss and comment on I guess there could always have been a pre-proposal-proposal, etc. ;) But seriously, this is exactly the time for people to comment and feedback on the proposal forum: http://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php?t=msg&th=208592&start=0&S=0890746b681a33b7c46c12f956af071c and just to make clear - this isn't a project being dumped over the wall, that would never get through the full Eclipse proposal process; which tries to make sure there's a growing, active, involved community around the project -- Cheers, Stuart > On May 6, 2011, at 9:27 AM, Neil Bartlett wrote: > >>> I'm just scratching my head trying to figure out why the Eclipse Foundation >>> would be considered a good landing spot for a project that is very far away >>> from all of the other projects there. >> >> Well then Kirk, look again at the projects that are currently hosted >> at Eclipse. Hudson will fit in very well... especially once it runs on >> top of OSGi (Equinox), uses embedded Jetty (also Eclipse project) and >> it integrates with Mylyn (Eclipse project) and JGit/EGit (both Eclipse >> projects). >> >> Cheers, >> Neil >> >> The only thing I can come up with is that they are hoping to piggyback >> on the success of the Eclipse IDE. It all seems like a reaction to >> Jenkins. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Kirk >>> >>> On May 5, 2011, at 2:39 PM, Phil wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> I caught this earlier today. I hope it is viewed as a positive move, >>>> not least because Oracle have in effect agreed, eventually, with those >>>> who created Jenkins. Ideally this would be the beginning of a >>>> reconciliation and 'join'. >>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>> "The Java Posse" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit this group >>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "The Java Posse" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
