On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:55:30 +0200, Ricky Clarkson
<[email protected]> wrote:
And a pretty negative perspective on at least some of those:
http://java.dzone.com/articles/multi-platform-frameworks-0
Still, nothing conceptually against the concept of a multi-platform
framework that holds water. They don't actually *have* to cater to the
lowest common denominator, even though perhaps the current crop do just
that. A winner in this space could be very successful.
My thoughts are that such tools (I'm referring of the whole class of tools
that allow to code in a single way and then translate to the native stuff)
are ok for specific application domains. For instance, you want to do a
catalog of products, go for that (my experience is also that corporates
involved in this business develop their own tools). This approach fails
for generic stuff.
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
[email protected]
http://tidalwave.it - http://fabriziogiudici.it
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
