On Tue, 01 May 2012 19:41:57 +0200, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote:

On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 6:46:05 PM UTC+2, phil swenson wrote:

I remember being very disappointed when I first looked at Java for
writing desktop UIs.  It was a huge step backwards from all the
lessons learned from Delphi and VB in the 90s.  No properties, no
events,  layout hell, overly complicated APIs.


And yet, the hardcore Java developer will defend it vigorously.

This is not true as most Java developers know that Swing is pretty old. BTW, getting back to the original Phil's statement, apart from the fact that you can have properties in the language with an annotation processor, I'd like to know what does he mean with "no events". One of the problems of Swing is perhaps that there are too many (kinds of) events.

--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
[email protected]
http://tidalwave.it - http://fabriziogiudici.it

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java 
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to