Removing the classpath is not a part of the proposal.  Java is not intended
to break over time.
On Aug 30, 2012 12:35 PM, "Thomas Matthijs" <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Kevin Wright <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I always figured that anyone who wanted lambdas that much would be
> sailing
> > the choppy JVM waters on a differently lingual boat by now.  It's not as
> > though you even have to change your ops infrastructure or much of your
> > tooling to do so.
>
> If it was up to me sure, but convincing my coworkers :x, in the end
> everyone on the team needs to be able to understand/fix any part of
> our codebase, (guess you'll tell me to find another job).
> It's a lot easier to push an upgrade to java x through then to teach
> them scala/.../.. (along with their tooling for compiling, IDE setup,
> etc )
>
> > (hint: rename scala.jar/clojure.jar/groovy.jar/whatever.jar to
> > apache-closures.jar, release your project binaries as you always did.
>  Don't
> > make a song and dance about it, it's easier to ask forgiveness than to
> > request permission)
> >
> > Jigsaw on the other hand... That means distinctions like SE/ME can be
> done
> > away with, long-deprecated code can finally be removed, startup time,
> > download time, and memory foot print can be reduced, etc.  It makes Java
> far
> > more suitable for running on something like the Raspberry Pi.  These are
> > cross-cutting concerns that benefit all languages on the Java platform.
>
> I think most of us are using java server side, where none of these
> things matter at all, i don't even think it starts up slow.
> Sure it can help with very limited jarhell with like xerces/jaxb etc,
> but for the average joe these things have been solved long ago or our
> application wouldn't function at all.
>
> Also if jigsaw is in the same release as lambdas and the classpath no
> longer exists and all tools/scripts/whatever need to be updated, this
> will make it a lot hander to push the upgrade to that java version
> through, and delay when I can use the other new shinies even longer.
>
> However if you already jumped ship to an alternative jvm language,
> there is not much in java8 for you, so i understand those people
> pushing hard to get jigsaw in it.
>
> >
> > Defender methods and method handles are also just plain awesome.  Even
> > without lambdas, I'd fully expect some powerful optimisations to be
> realised
> > on top of those two.
>
> I kind of lump those together with lambdas :)
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 30 August 2012 15:57, Thomas Matthijs <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Ricky Clarkson
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > I want my lambdas now and I'm in a job where using non-Java languages
> >> > will be a difficult sell.  The earlier the release the better for me.
> >> >
> >> > I've seen classpath hell exactly once, actually in a current project,
> >> > and plan to deal with it in a different way - attempting to
> >> > find/create a combination of libraries that don't have version
> >> > conflicts, and where that is not possible, moving tasks out of the
> >> > same JVM process.
> >> >
> >> > The other benefit would be JVM startup time, which is less and less an
> >> > issue each year as machines get faster and Java doesn't get bigger.
> >> > I'd like to see the startup time be improved further, but lambdas will
> >> > affect me more than cutting down startup from 5 seconds to 1.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> I agree fully, jigsaw won't fix any problem i currently have, lambdas
> >> on the other hand would be very beneficial
> >>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Java Posse" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java 
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to