On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:49 AM, picolax <[email protected]>wrote:
> it seems the basic argument expressed by those who support google's tax > evasion/avoidance (and don't hit me with semantics, they are both the same > it's just one is artificially within the law) Right, in much the same way that "stealing" and "cutting in line" are both crimes, it's just that one is artificially within the law. Don't bother me with semantics. > is that seeing as the government can't come up with a decent law it is > therefore the companies obligation to pay the least amount of tax because It's not an obligation, it's just common sense, which extends to individuals as well. Why wouldn't you strive to pay as little tax as possible while remaining within the law? Ah that's right, you don't believe in the boundaries defined by laws. -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
