On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:49 AM, picolax <[email protected]>wrote: > >> it seems the basic argument expressed by those who support google's tax >> evasion/avoidance (and don't hit me with semantics, they are both the same >> it's just one is artificially within the law) > > > Right, in much the same way that "stealing" and "cutting in line" are both > crimes, it's just that one is artificially within the law. Don't bother me > with semantics. > That seems simplistic. This would be akin to complaining the those that took the VIP entrance were "cutting in line." If you disagree with the existence of a VIP entrance, that is one thing. But to just decry it as a crime that is "artificially" within the law (a strange phrase) is silly. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
