On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Boris Dainson wrote: >It's write-read-write-read so it looks like the best you >can do here is to do all writes through async and reads >through sync cutting time up to a half (if asyncSubmit >takes no time). That's not bad.
asyncSubmit should no (or almost no) time, but it returns before the submission is complete. So if you need to wait for the submission to finish, it won't help. With the way you're describing I2C, it doesn't sound like it's intended to be a fast interface; making Isochronous transfers dependent on Control transfers is completely opposite of what Isochronous is designed to be. -- Dan Streetman [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------- 186,272 miles per second: It isn't just a good idea, it's the law! ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en _______________________________________________ javax-usb-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javax-usb-devel
