I suspect it will be easier to just hardcode what we need, unfortunately. That is what libusb did, anyway.
On Dec 3, 2007 9:16 AM, Mark Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Roger Lindsjö wrote: > > I checked in a change in jni/JavaxUsbKernel.h, to use ch9.h instead of > > usb.h as usb.h currently does not seem to be intended for user land code. > > > > If this causes problems for anyone, then well have to change it again. > > I think you're going to find distro differences here. I run a mix of > Debian versions and see: > > etch: /usr/include/linux/usb_ch9.h (in package linux-kernel-dev) > sid: /usr/include/linux/usb/ch9.h (in package linux-libc-dev) > > (they look the same at first glance but note the '_' and corresponding '/'). > > I don't know about other distros. Maybe it's just Debian. > > -- > Mark Scott > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper > from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going > mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. > http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 > _______________________________________________ > javax-usb-devel mailing list > javax-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javax-usb-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ javax-usb-devel mailing list javax-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javax-usb-devel
