On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 11:40 +0200, Nacho G. Mac Dowell wrote: > I have a few questions regarding jaxme's mavenizing. I'm sure there are > more to come :-) > > - Project JaxMe2 has been renamed to JaxMeCore so it doesn't clash with > the top-level project. Any other ideas?
+0 > - How do we want to handle subproject's version? All subprojects have > the same version? +1 > - Where do we want the resulting jars to be? Stick with dist? not sure i parse this one correctly... > - Do we want the target directory and dist directory on cvs? IMHO no. no for me also > - The checkstyle.xml file used is the same Maven uses. Maybe review to > suit our needs. IMHO if we're going to use checkstyle it *really* need to be very close to what we have already and we need to make a commitment to ensuring all code complies. otherwise, it's not worth having... > - All tests (except for PM - which I haven't started mavenizing) are ran > by maven but VersionTest from JS fails because it is expected to be ran > by ant. Any ideas? not without knowing a few more details (but maybe someone else would like to jump in here...) > Also JS.antlr.test is not a junit test. Should a > junit test be made? use jelly unit? sounds good :) - robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
