Hi, Nacho, I'll only reply to those points, to which Frederic and/or Robert haven't already replied:
On 8/3/05, Nacho G. Mac Dowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - Where do we want the resulting jars to be? Stick with dist? Being relatively new to Maven, I'd assume that the "dist" directory is no longer needed. If I get the concepts right, then the jar files are initially created below "target" and copied to the "local repository" later on. I think it's best to take it exactly as proposed by Maven. > - The checkstyle.xml file used is the same Maven uses. Maybe review to > suit our needs. I wouldn't use checkstyle, until someone makes a serious effort to clean up the sources. As soon as someone did, we can very well add the file later. > - All tests (except for PM - which I haven't started mavenizing) are ran > by maven but VersionTest from JS fails because it is expected to be ran > by ant. Any ideas? Also JS.antlr.test is not a junit test. Should a > junit test be made? It's fine, if you leave out PM for the first step. We can add it later on. The JS.antlr.test can be made a JUnit test with a single test method quite easily: Basically you create an instance of JavaParser and invoke its main method. Jochen -- What are the first steps on the moon, compared to your child's? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
