The concept is similar to a jsp container which is one of the most widely applications of java. But i agree with the point made earlier. No EasyLanguage. The fact that we are pure java ( especially strategy and indicator code) is what attracted me to this project.
On Sep 9, 7:19 pm, nonlinear5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, I understand this better now. While I see the potential benefit of > saving a few clicks and of easier JBT set up and deployment, it seems > to me that the actual savings in time would be negligible, considering > that they would be offset by presumably less productive Java > development in some sort of a custom editor where it would be much > more error prone. Granted, Java would still report syntax errors, even > if compiling is done by reflection, and you could correct the errors, > but this entire concepts sounds a little strange to me. It's almost > like reinventing an IDE. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JBookTrader" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jbooktrader?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
