> ok, interesting feature, I did not think about. > However, it gives 4 times as many strategies to the smaller system. > (Besides being older the PC also has only two cores, while the > MacBook > has 2 full cores + two hyperthreading (i.e., appear as 4 cores)) > Shouldn't it then be the other way round? > > Yes, it should be the other way around. In all likelihood, you have the "Density Coverage" parameter set differently. On the "Optimization Dialog", click "Advanced", and make sure that the "Coverage Density" is set the same on both systems.
For the purposes of determining which system is faster to run optimizations, use the "brute force" optimization option. If you want to compare your results with other people, see this benchmark: http://groups.google.com/group/jbooktrader/browse_thread/thread/cb5a20bdcfc47c81/eea0042e413c196f -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JBookTrader" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jbooktrader?hl=en.
