Hm, now it starts to doubt my thinking.. I had already cross-checked that: everything is set to the "sparsest". Upon trying to reproduce the initial behavior, I get as a result everywhere the 2401 strategies (even without even touching anything). I am wondering whether it could be that there is a difference between initial run (first run of JBookTrader at all). I just fired up Eclipse again under MacOS and Windows and got the same result I had on my old PC all along (no difference due to differences in cores).
.. let's file this under mysteries as it will be hard to turn this into a reproducable error (fresh install of Eclipse, JBookTrader, etc.) Anyway. If the sources of the MacOS installation guide appear again, I will try to update this. Klaus On Aug 14, 4:39 pm, Eugene Kononov <[email protected]> wrote: > > ok, interesting feature, I did not think about. > > However, it gives 4 times as many strategies to the smaller system. > > (Besides being older the PC also has only two cores, while the > > MacBook > > has 2 full cores + two hyperthreading (i.e., appear as 4 cores)) > > Shouldn't it then be the other way round? > > Yes, it should be the other way around. In all likelihood, you have the > "Density Coverage" parameter set differently. On the "Optimization Dialog", > click "Advanced", and make sure that the "Coverage Density" is set the same > on both systems. > > For the purposes of determining which system is faster to run optimizations, > use the "brute force" optimization option. If you want to compare your > results with other people, see this > benchmark:http://groups.google.com/group/jbooktrader/browse_thread/thread/cb5a2... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JBookTrader" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jbooktrader?hl=en.
