At 08:57 30/10/00 -0500, you wrote: >I think you covered RMS feelings on the issue quite well. GPL should be >used for all code and it should infect everything. Sort of like the borg. exactly ;) >I personally don't see the value in using GPL vs the other licenses, but I'm >a user not a developer. I can see value in the integration of tomcat or >another servlet engine and jBoss. If others can do it, but jBoss can't, it >will hurt jBoss. Maybe not alot, but it will always be a checkbox unchecked >in any evaluation. Worse would be the fact that they couldn't host EJBs because ejb.jar is not GPL compatable ;) Cheers, Pete *------------------------------------------------------* | "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want | | to test a man's character, give him power." | | -Abraham Lincoln | *------------------------------------------------------*
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Ole Husgaard
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Vincent Sheffer
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Jay Walters
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Ole Husgaard
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Micheal J
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Micheal J
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Micheal J
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
