Tom,
from the man who got us PETSTORE running on JBOSS online I find this very
"naysayer"...
let rob run with it, he does it or he doesn't, just sit tight and wait, if
he doesn't deliver he doesn't deliver.
"impossible" isn't really in our vocabulary is it?
marc
|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom
|Coleman
|Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 11:29 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Support for WebLogic and other vendor jars
|
|
|>
|> I agree with both of you that it should NOT be part of the core code,
|> thats why I suggested to refactor that section to support
|various different
|> types via a plugin, once it was working.
|>
|
| I must have missed that.
|
|> An external utility is an extra step that a developer needs to
|go through to
|> write beans, and results in two xml files..... It is much nicer
|just to have
|> one, this follows the "drop it in and run it" philosophy of JBoss.
|
| I agree that a utility is an extra step, but I think it would be a price
| that a developer would be willing to pay in order to deploy on another
| server.
|
| I just saw a comment posted by a WL user that he doubted whether
|_any_ tool
| would be able to convert the WL-specific ejb-jar descriptor.
|
| You must think it can be done.
|
|> I was thinking along the lines of having this behavior
|configurable in an
|> MBean, and off by default. If it was on then the server would
|also read in
|> the weblogic-ejb-jar.xml
|
| If you think it can be done and eliminate the need for a utility in the
| process, I guess it sounds good to me.
|
| Anything that allows JBoss to deploy WL apps sounds good to me.
|
| Scott?
|
|
|_______________________________________________
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
