> Wouldn't it make more sense to call these tags Rel_2_2_0_a, Rel_2_2_0_b, > then, after JBoss_2_2_1, Rel_2_2_1_a, Rel_2_2_1_b, etc? well, this discussion was brought up earlier, and it was determined to use a three digit version number. hence when you create a new release of version 2.2 (release 2.2.x), it becomes 2.2.++x Filip ~ Namaste - I bow to the divine in you ~ Filip Hanik Software Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.filip.net _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
- [JBoss-dev] Added Rel_2_2_1 tag to Branch_2_2 Scott M Stark
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Added Rel_2_2_1 tag to Branch_2_2 Bordet, Simone
- Re: [JBoss-dev] Added Rel_2_2_1 tag to Branch_2_2 Scott M Stark
- Re: [JBoss-dev] Added Rel_2_2_1 tag to Branch_2_2 Toby Allsopp
- Re: [JBoss-dev] Added Rel_2_2_1 tag to Branch_... Filip Hanik
- Re: [JBoss-dev] Added Rel_2_2_1 tag to Bra... Scott M Stark
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Added Rel_2_2_1 tag t... Filip Hanik
- Re: [JBoss-dev] Added Rel_2_2_1 tag to Branch_... Scott M Stark
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Added Rel_2_2_1 tag to Branch_2_2 Bordet, Simone
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Added Rel_2_2_1 tag to Branch_2_2 marc fleury
- Re: [JBoss-dev] Added Rel_2_2_1 tag to Branch_2_2 Scott M Stark