But Toby is talking about the "internal" patch versions which are not public releases.
So how would the version tags go for the 2.2.0 -> 2.2.1 -> 2.2.2 JBoss releases?
JBoss_2_2_0
+ Rel_2_2_1
+ Rel_2_2_2
+ Rel_2_2_3
|
JBoss_2_2_1
+ Rel_2_2_? (Rel_2_2_4 ?)
...
JBoss_2_2_2
----- Original Message -----
From: "Filip Hanik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 4:04 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Added Rel_2_2_1 tag to Branch_2_2
> > Wouldn't it make more sense to call these tags Rel_2_2_0_a, Rel_2_2_0_b,
> > then, after JBoss_2_2_1, Rel_2_2_1_a, Rel_2_2_1_b, etc?
>
> well, this discussion was brought up earlier, and it was determined to use a
> three digit version number.
> hence when you create a new release of version 2.2 (release 2.2.x), it
> becomes 2.2.++x
>
> Filip
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
