I'll begin the work tomorrow :)
Cheers,
/Jesper
On Monday 11 June 2001 15:33, you wrote:
> You're right. I can't find the javadoc on my machine that had the abstract
> methods in interfaces, but the only files I actually did myself were the
> Connector API ones and I don't seem to have that Javadoc right now. Maybe
> it was in the O'Reilly book appendix? I remember thinking it was odd when
> I saw it. It's not important.
>
> As I said in my previous email the abstract keyword on an interface method
> clearly will have no impact, so feel free to change it.
>
> As for the javadoc, we had a pretty fair amount on the initial checkin, but
> I wouldn't be surprised if we missed some, or if some is missing on the
> latest 2.0 bits so again feel free to add.
>
> Cheers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesper Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 7:07 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Reason for abstract methods in jboss-j2ee
>
>
> You can say that methods in an interface are abstract, since the
> interface doesn't contain an implementation.
>
> But I see no reason for declaring them abstract, since the abstract keyword
> only has meaning when used in a class definition.
>
> Sun doesn't declare methods in the interfaces abstract -- check the Javadoc
> generated from EJB 2.0 PFD2 compared to jboss-j2ee.
>
> I think we -- and I would be willing to do that -- should clean the
> interfaces such that they don't use the abstract keyword.
>
> And a bit more Javadoc wouldn't hurt ;)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jesper
>
> On Monday 11 June 2001 12:22, you wrote:
> > Not from the point of view of how things work. Interfaces are always
> > abstract. I am pretty sure that is the way sun declares them which is
> > why we did them that way first time.
> >
> > Javadoc certainly won't hurt.
> >
> > By he way Marc F, Jesper did the first pass of EJB 2.0 support for the
> > jboss-j2ee project so he's been contributing...
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jesper Pedersen
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 6/11/01 2:39 AM
> > Subject: [JBoss-dev] Reason for abstract methods in jboss-j2ee
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > Is there a reason for declaring the interface methods in jboss-j2ee for
> > abstract ?
> >
> > If not I'll clean it up and add JavaDoc ;)
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Jesper
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
