>From the Java Language Spec, interfaces and their methods are implicitly
abstract,
so it doesn't matter whether you mark them as abstract or not (though Sun
recommends doing so and most people never do).
tim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jay Walters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, 11 June 2001 22:22
> To: 'Jesper Pedersen '; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Reason for abstract methods in jboss-j2ee
>
>
> Not from the point of view of how things work. Interfaces are always
> abstract. I am pretty sure that is the way sun declares them
> which is why
> we did them that way first time.
>
> Javadoc certainly won't hurt.
>
> By he way Marc F, Jesper did the first pass of EJB 2.0 support for the
> jboss-j2ee project so he's been contributing...
>
> Cheers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesper Pedersen
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 6/11/01 2:39 AM
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] Reason for abstract methods in jboss-j2ee
>
> Hi.
>
> Is there a reason for declaring the interface methods in
> jboss-j2ee for
> abstract ?
>
> If not I'll clean it up and add JavaDoc ;)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jesper
>
> --
> Jesper Pedersen, M.Sc. C.S.E
> Open Source Solution Manager
>
> Sun Certified Java 2 Developer
>
> IT+ A/S Phone: +45 86 78 21 00
> Brendstrupg�rdsvej 7 Fax: +45 86 78 21 02
> 8200 �rhus N Direct:+45 87 40 08 49
> Denmark Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
