> Ok, you are not getting it. > I am it's just that the moon is gone ;)
> Although JBossCMP does not generate the column names you would like, the > system still runs. Is that correct? (i.e., this is still a suggestion) > If I use the jbosscmp-jdbc.xml file I can get it to work. > Ok now that we agree on that. How would you like the column names > generated? Be very very specific and take into consideraton the above > problems. > I do no want jboss to generate any column names. It's not necessary. Either the class field is the database column name or in jbosscmp-jdbc.xml you specify that class field x maps to database column y. If there is a name space collision then it is a database setup problem not JBOSS's and we should not be coding for it. > As for my comment "easy to code," that is perfectly valid, as we are > shooting for CMP 2.0 compliance. CMP 2.0 is a huge spec, so everything can > not be "perfect" in the first pass. Some of the implementation details get > implemnted the easy way. There have to be priorities. > Yup, it's just this one looks like something that will fill the mailing lists. If you pulled togther your test cases then I could probably have a look, you do not have to do this whole thing by yourself. _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
