That would seem to be a little too restrictive a naming requirement. Using isJavaIdentifierPart may be more acceptable. What is the current naming problem?
----- Original Message ----- From: "David Budworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 5:22 PM Subject: [JBoss-dev] JMS queue names (again) > Ok, now that we have the ability to set the JNDI name on a queue/topic, > I would like to fix the bug (that I put in) in regards to deep queue > names. > > For simplicities sake, I'll just revert the file PM back to the way it > was. > > But, since there was (and will be when I revert) a bug there that if > you create a queue/topic with depth (ie: mycompany/queues/q1) > > The File PM will fail at next startup. > > So, I'd like to add some name validation. > > Is anyone uncomfortable if I enforce the queue names to be alpha-numeric > only? (via, Character.isLetterOrDigit()) > JBoss (as it ships), doesn't define any topics/queues that would violate > that rule right now. > > Opinions? > > -David > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
