On 2001.11.29 21:06:27 -0500 David Budworth wrote: > After taking a shot at implementing this, by way of making the > QueueManager and TopicManager's startService() function do the > validation and throw if it fails, I find that the MBean get's stuck in > the JMX tree. > > Is this a MBeanServer bug? (where a bean doesn't go away when an > exception is thrown by start())?
I'll fix this... gradually finding the problems here. david jencks > > I've seen this before. So I think it is. But I don't want to commit my > code just in case it's my bug. (since it requires a jboss restart to > make it go away). > > -David > > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, David Budworth wrote: > > > Ok, now that we have the ability to set the JNDI name on a queue/topic, > > I would like to fix the bug (that I put in) in regards to deep queue > > names. > > > > For simplicities sake, I'll just revert the file PM back to the way it > > was. > > > > But, since there was (and will be when I revert) a bug there that if > > you create a queue/topic with depth (ie: mycompany/queues/q1) > > > > The File PM will fail at next startup. > > > > So, I'd like to add some name validation. > > > > Is anyone uncomfortable if I enforce the queue names to be > alpha-numeric > > only? (via, Character.isLetterOrDigit()) > > JBoss (as it ships), doesn't define any topics/queues that would > violate > > that rule right now. > > > > Opinions? > > > > -David > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
