David Jencks wrote: > On 2001.12.06 12:46:21 -0500 Luke Taylor wrote: > >> >>Ah. I'm glad someone else has some reservations. I assumed I was just >>lagging behind (probably true anyway) and that everyone else knew >>exactly what was going on from all the discussions on sars and services >>so it's good to hear a mildly dissenting voice with some clout. >> > > On the other hand, I think quite a few people have said it was confusing at > first and useful when they got used to it. >
I'm sure it's v. useful and I wasn't intending to make any criticisms one way or the other. It's just that there have been tons of discussions where I haven't had a clue what was going on. I'm not even sure that having a single file is necessarily less confusing than multiple files, one for each service. I like the idea of being able to just drop an encapsulated service description into a running server and having it deployed in the same way as an application. The fact that other servers use a single configuration file isn't really an argument in itself. This system also makes configuration less of an issue - you can just supply someope with the appropriate sar files along with your app and tell them to drop them into the deploy directory. I'm just not quite clear on how it's all fitting together, but thanks for your answers. I can already see the fog lifting ... Luke. -- Luke Taylor. Monkey Machine Ltd. PGP Key ID: 0x57E9523C http://www.mkeym.com _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
