Yannick Menager wrote: > ... > Like I mentioned in the other email, it's a question of > expectations. and that kind of award bumps up ALOT people's expectation > alot. And when it comes to this kind of products, you don't get many > chances to win people's hearts. If you burn them once, you probably > won't manage to ever convince them to even bother trying again. If that > award had been for 3.0, It would have been quite ok, but 2.4 ..... erm... >
My point about checking the platform out properly before deploying on it was that nobody should get burnt by something like this. No self respecting "enterprise" is likely to suddenly decide to deploy on JBoss purely on the basis of some Javaworlds award. They will take the time to evaluate it's capabilities like any other server. So I don't see there being any sudden nasty surprises - many large organizations are aware of it already, often using it in development or for internal systems and are keeping an eye on it for the future. I'm not arguing about the features of one app. server over another, largely 'cos I don't have an in-depth knowledge of them all - I haven't used Weblogic since version 5 which, as you say, was dreadful. I just don't see why the criteria should be the ones you mention. Luke. -- Luke Taylor. Monkey Machine Ltd. PGP Key ID: 0x57E9523C http://www.mkeym.com _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
