On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, marc fleury wrote: > The reason I don't serialize the instance itself is that the client needs to > know about the ObjectName class then and I don't want to ship all of JMX to > a client. > > are we in sync? > > marcf >
Understood now. IMO Juha's solution seems better insulated from changes to JMX spec (or implementation for that matter). Just to be a complete pain - the client would only need ObjectName, MalformedObjectNameException, OperationsException and JMRuntimeException - not the hole JMX impl. Cleaning up the serialized form of ObjectName is something I have to do anyhow and it would just make this problem go away... Trev _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
