Yes. This will be the default html adaptor in the 3.0.1 default and all configs. The minimal config will keep the ri adaptor since that config has no servlet container.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Finn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:42 AM Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss in a multi developers environment > So you can undeploy jmx-html-adaptor.sar, and instead deploy this servlet to > your Jetty/Tomcat. Neat. The bigger benefit here is that you can put your > own security constraints on it so Joe Fatfinger can't point a browser at > 8082 and stop or remove running services. I like. Wish I had known sooner > about this one.... > > #mike > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott > M Stark > Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss in a multi developers > environment > > > There is a replacement servlet in the varia package under > src/main/org/jboss/jmx. Being just a regular war it has all the > capbilities of a web application/web container including configuration > of the ports, bind address, transport encryption, and role based > security. > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Scott Stark > Chief Technology Officer > JBoss Group, LLC > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
