>I'm not sure...The problem with Versioning and Remoting is that a proxy object is required. You have to return a different object than the one actually constructed. >You getting me? I'm not sure if this can be done within bytecode manipulation. I'll have to ask the Javassist guys.
Why? Basically in rmeoting, you would just dispatch each method invocation across the wire and the local object would just serve as a phantom object and not actually contain any state, etc. Why does it has to be a real proxy...? Maybe I'm not following. That way, I could new an object, which is actually a local representation of a remoted object on another machine. I could also add a clustered intercetor which might then load balance invocations across to different real remote objects. I think this is possible. Right? Another thing to think about ... After looking at the javassist docs last night is something like using casting to dynamically add interceptors. This might be bad, haven't thought through all the implications ... But, imagine: Foo foo = new Foo (); // local object ((Transactable)foo).beginTx(); Foo.bar(); ((Transactable)foo).commitTx(); What if the mere casting of an object would allow you to dynamically attach an interceptor to the object before the invocation? This might be fairly powerful too. Looking at the javassist docs, it looks like you can get called on a Cast and InstanceOf call to an object. Maybe I'm being too whacky here ... Not sure. Something to ponder. Jeff ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
