I think the experiment overall worked (although Scott had some reservations about it so it's in HEAD but not 4.x).
It was about providing the EJBDeployer (in fact, it should work with all other deployers) the ability to instantiate and tear-down security domains, in the presence of a META-INF/login-config.xml. In fact, a lot of the the functionlity was already there, you write a JMX interceptor and apply it to an XMBean, so you need (a) to XMBean-ize the target deployer, (not a big deal) and (b) make sure your deployer is always accessed through the MBeanServer and not using a direct reference (some subdeployers do that). So I added the ability to attach/detach this interceptor dynamically to an XMBean. As a convenience I've made org.jboss.deployment.SubDeployerInterceptor that can be subclassed to demonstrate this. If the HARDeployer can be thought-of as an add-on (aspect, interceptor, whatever) to SARDeployer or other subdeployers then this will probably work. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3872620#3872620 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3872620 ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
