Hey
Oleg Nitz wrote:
>
> Dan OConnor wrote:
> DO> I see what you are saying. Of course, if the recommendations of
> DO> the spec are followed, the ejb-ref-name will never match the
> DO> referenced bean name exactly... because one will be XXX, and one
> DO> will be ejb/XXX.
> I don't think that the examples of ejb-link usage are
> the recommendations of the spec.
> I would prefer to set ejb-name to ejb/XXX. Why not?
Names of EJB's should be set to, well, plain names, without prefixes or
suffixes.
> But if it is a common understanding...
Why would you want it otherwise? It's just a name that is to be unique
within the deployment. And there's nothing else that can be named within
the same namespace.
> Rickard, could you provide support for this naming scheme in EJX?
Support for smart linking (ejb/XXX -> XXX, XXX -> ejb/XXX) is already in
there :-)
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.jboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
