Dan OConnor wrote:
>
> On 19 May 00, at 19:34, Rickard �berg wrote:
>
> >
> > > 3. The ejb-ref-name, both trimmed and untrimmed (since putting it
> > > in the "ejb" context is a recommendation, not a mandate, of the
> > > spec.) I think we should call this the "Oleg default." :-)
> >
> > IMHO unnecessary, since this procedure is done to fill in the info for
> > the 1. case by the GUI. And it is counter to the spec (14.3.4).
> >
> > > Count me in, unless somene has a compelling argument against it.
> >
> > The idea is good, but only in the XML editing phase, not in theF
> > deployment phase.
> >
> > /Rickard
>
> Hi Rickard,
>
> Fair enough. All the information in the reference is being used to
> make the deployment process as simple as possible, including
> information that exists because of common naming conventions.
> That's the main point; I'm not against this happening in the XML
> editing phase as opposed to the final deployment phase.
>
> I will make one minor point. The ultimate user-friendly deployment
> is that a bean developer can just plop his jar or ear into a directory
> and not worry about any JBoss-specific settings at all. I don't mind
> making the developer who wants this feature use ejb-link, but we
> can add additional value for the case where the developer has
> followed a set of naming conventions during development (as some
> certainly will) but didn't use the optional ejb-link feature.
>
> This capability would not violate 14.3.3, even if ejb-link is not
> specified. If he or she enables this option in JBoss, this "naming
> convention match" IS the container-specific deployment tool. So
> the only unresolved EJB references of which we would need to
> inform him or her, would be the ones without an appropriate binding
> even after naming convention matches are applied.
>
> Would anyone want this?
Here's my vote...yes. However, you may want to also indicate in the
deployment output log that the deployer recognized these references and
automatically added them. That way, if the bean provider or assembler
had not intended that automatically created reference, they'd have some
indication of what the system did on their behalf.
Rick Horowitz
>
> -Dan
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
