Dan OConnor wrote:
>
> On 20 May 00, at 15:22, "jBoss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> dogs.com wrote:
>
> > Technically, this makes the license incompatible with a GPL
> license
> > because it imposes an additional requirement on the software.
> My opinion
> > is that "due credit" is not an unreasonable burden, and if there
> were
> > substantial benefits to be had by incorporating software that was
> under the
> > Exolab license, we could probably vote to have a simple
> addendum to our
> > GPL license along the lines of: "The due credit text file must
> accompany
> > all distributions of this software."
> >
>
> Just a quick note to correct a slight inaccuracy. This addendum to
> the GPL license would have to be approved by the original
> copyright holders of affected code as well. Right now, for the
> relevant persistence code, I think that would be Rickard (and Marc
> as his employer?) We may want to make some arrangement for
<pride>
no I actually wrote the first code with Joe Shevland in jboss1.0
the code was refactored and rewritten by Rickard in jboss2.0
</pride>
jBoss 2.0 version is the one we would use however so you are right.
sorry, it is just that I did write most of the code in jboss and would
hate to see my contributions go to hell, I am just another mortal
looking for credit.
;-)
marc
> the general case before the number of copyright holders grows too
> large.
>
> I don't mean to go changing other people's licenses without their
> permission. :-)
>
> -Dan
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Visit Telkel at JavaOne(SM), Sun's 2000 Worldwide Java Developer
Conference(SM)
June 5-9, 2000 - Moscone Center - San Francisco
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
