Natraj Gujran writes: > Thanks for the reply, Jonathan. > So I guess our understanding was right about the Entity Beans. We have to > stay away from CMP. Why stay away from CMP? Why not just come up with some custom data structure which you can pass out which is constructed from the members? Then the individual data members are persisted using CMP but the client accesses it as one object using a single getData() like call. Tom -- -------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Natraj Gujran
- RE: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Jonathan Carlson
- RE: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Natraj Gujran
- Re: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Tom Cook
- Re: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us... Rickard Oberg
- Re: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Jonathan Carlson
- Re: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Kyle Cordes
- Re[2]: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Oleg Nitz
- RE: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Jonathan Carlson
- RE: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Tom Cook
- Re: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Rickard Oberg
- Re: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Rickard Oberg
- Re: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Fr�d�ric FANIEN
