> Is it alright to not have a transaction used on a getXXX method? > ie. in the assembly-descriptor list which methods require transactions > and don't list getXXX? Exactly, use "TX_SUPPORTS"!!! That way you get speedy read-only mode, and you can still get consistent values when used in tx's. /Rickard -- -------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Jonathan Carlson
- RE: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Natraj Gujran
- RE: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Tom Cook
- Re: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Rickard Oberg
- Re: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Jonathan Carlson
- Re: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Kyle Cordes
- Re[2]: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Oleg Nitz
- RE: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Jonathan Carlson
- RE: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Tom Cook
- Re: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Rickard Oberg
- Re: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Rickard Oberg
- Re: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Fr�d�ric FANIEN
- Re: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Rickard Oberg
- RE: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us... marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? marc fleury
- [jBoss-User] can you beat your compiler Kyle Cordes
- RE: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? marc fleury
