Hi > Natraj Gujran writes: > > Thanks for the reply, Jonathan. > > So I guess our understanding was right about the Entity Beans. We have to > > stay away from CMP. > > Why stay away from CMP? > > Why not just come up with some custom data structure which you can > pass out which is constructed from the members? Then the individual > data members are persisted using CMP but the client accesses it as one > object using a single getData() like call. Agree 100%. As I noted earlier, the EJBDoclet I wrote will help you do this effortlessly (dreambean.com/ejbdoclet.html). /Rickard -- -------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Natraj Gujran
- RE: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Jonathan Carlson
- RE: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Natraj Gujran
- RE: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Tom Cook
- Re: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us... Rickard Oberg
- Re: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Jonathan Carlson
- Re: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Kyle Cordes
- Re[2]: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Oleg Nitz
- RE: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Jonathan Carlson
- RE: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Tom Cook
- Re: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Rickard Oberg
- Re: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Rickard Oberg
- Re: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us ? Fr�d�ric FANIEN
- Re: [jBoss-User] Is EJB the model for us... Rickard Oberg
