Hi!

>Will the planned use of RMI-IIOP in JBoss prevent us from using RMI-JRMP?
I
>want to have my client able to use either protocols depending on the EJB
>used.  Currently, JBoss works great with our clients using JRMP whereas I
>can't seem to get them to talk properly to the J2EE RI (which I think is
>related to IIOP handicaps).  I would like to avoid using IIOP if at all
>possible.


I speak for most here I think when I say that JRMP will always be the
preferred way to use jBoss. It's unbeatable IMHO.

We will support IIOP at some point, if nothing else but to shut up the
"waah, it's not J2EE compliant" folks. <g>

Some people may actually have a need for it too, and since one of the core
principles of jBoss is to adapt to its users needs, IIOP is a good thing *as
an additional option*.

Clear? :-)

/Rickard





--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to