Rickard,
Thanks for the quick reply. So does being J2EE compliant mean you *don't*
have to force clients to use IIOP? The J2EE specs seem to indicate that
JRMP is supported, but I don't see how to configure J2EE to allow it and I'm
assuming then that J2EE-compliant clients must use IIOP.
-Ron
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rickard Oberg
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 4:05 PM
> To: jBoss
> Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] RMI-IIOP
>
>
> Hi!
>
> >Will the planned use of RMI-IIOP in JBoss prevent us from using RMI-JRMP?
> I
> >want to have my client able to use either protocols depending on the EJB
> >used. Currently, JBoss works great with our clients using JRMP whereas I
> >can't seem to get them to talk properly to the J2EE RI (which I think is
> >related to IIOP handicaps). I would like to avoid using IIOP if at all
> >possible.
>
>
> I speak for most here I think when I say that JRMP will always be the
> preferred way to use jBoss. It's unbeatable IMHO.
>
> We will support IIOP at some point, if nothing else but to shut up the
> "waah, it's not J2EE compliant" folks. <g>
>
> Some people may actually have a need for it too, and since one of the core
> principles of jBoss is to adapt to its users needs, IIOP is a
> good thing *as
> an additional option*.
>
> Clear? :-)
>
> /Rickard
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
