Hi!

Aaron Mulder wrote:
>         No, this is not the desired behavior.  I believe this is related
> to the bugs Rickard was complaining about in the JAR URL handlers in the
> JDK.  The redeployment behavior was supposed to be fixed for the final
> release.  Rickard, is this indeed one of the things on your plate?  If
> not, it should be assigned - I think there's a bug in Bugzilla.

Hm.. I haven't seen this one before. It should not be related to the JAR
handlers, since we now copy the JARs all the time. 

If the old file is in classpath that could explain it. Otherwise I don't
know really. BugZilla it.

/Rickard

-- 
Rickard �berg

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to