On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Rickard �berg wrote:
> Hm.. I haven't seen this one before. It should not be related to the JAR
> handlers, since we now copy the JARs all the time.
>
> If the old file is in classpath that could explain it. Otherwise I don't
> know really. BugZilla it.
>
> /Rickard

        I think this is bugs 146 & 202, both of which are marked as fixed.
Unfortunately, there isn't a particularly good description of *what* was
fixed... ("revamped autodeployer").  But perhaps these really have been
fixed, and this is a more subtle error WRT env entries or something...

Aaron



--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to