Richard Opalka [http://community.jboss.org/people/richard.opalka%40jboss.com] replied to the discussion
"CXF jms integration" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/541050#541050 -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Jim, let me agree with Alessio. We really don't need to introduce another DD (jbossws-endpoints.xml namely). There are two reasons for that: * XML configuration duplicity (as Alessio properly said users can just provide jbossws-cxf.xml with all the configuration) * simplicity (our current SPI facade should be enough for you to do the job). What you're doing (providing jbossws-endpoints.xml) is just creating WS stack agnostic configuration. But our SPI is intended exactly for that purpose. Providing additional DD is the same thing like our SPI (just different XML-ized form of it). If you will follow my suggestions I wrote few days before you shoudn't face "real" problems. Another thing/issue is our SPI is not perfect (and we know that). We will improve/rewrite our SPI once we'll be done with all the highier priority tasks we have these days. > Jim Ma wrote: > I evaluated to make new SPI metadata to extend the current SPI Endpoint. > But I did not find benifit from it, as our DeploymentAspects was intended to > process the SPI HttpEndpoint. It can not be reused to process JMSEndpoint too. > Let me disagree. This is the way you had to go IMHO ;) We need these abstractions in our SPI: * Endpoint - ServletEndpoint -> url address - JMSEndpoint -> jms address * DA - ServletDA - JMSDA Our ASIL deployers will accept DA abstraction and will be able to distinguish between HTTP and JMS. In deployer, before specifying inputs/outputs, you should have code like this: // pseudocode ensuring proper deployers ordering if (DA instanceof ServletDA) { this.addInput(WebMetaData.class); ... } else if (DA instanceof JMSDA) { this.addInput(JMSMetaData.class); ... } Both HTTP and JMS endpoints should use the same deployers flow. Don't create another deployer flow just for JMS endpoints. but reuse our current architeture. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/541050#541050] Start a new discussion in JBoss Web Services Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2047]
_______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
