Jim Ma [http://community.jboss.org/people/jim.ma] replied to the discussion
"CXF jms integration" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/541296#541296 -------------------------------------------------------------- > 1) AFAIK jbossws-cxf.xml is generated only in case there isn't one provided. > The scenario of deploying both JMS and Servlet endpoints in one war > using one jbossws-cxf.xml DD should be supported. > I don't expect any real issues with this scenario. Sorry , I may do not explain this problem well . We now create SPI endpoint from ServletMetaData in web.xml . How to distinguish the jms tranport endpoint and create jms endpoint/MD from the user provided jbossws-cxf.xml like : <jaxws:endpoint id='HttpHelloService' implementor='org.jboss.test.ws.jaxws.samples.HelloImpl> </jaxws:endpoint> <!--jms endpoint-> <jaxws:endpoint id='JMSHelloService' wsdlLocation="./wsdl/jms-samples.wsdl" implementor='org.jboss.test.ws.jaxws.samples.HelloImpl> </jaxws:endpoint> > True, you cannot resolve dependency on JMS deployers in DA code. This can be > done only in deployers. > But you're able to detect if particular DA is JMS DA or Servlet DA. See my > suggestion (the pseudocode) > in my previous post how to resolve this issue in our > WSDeploymentAspectDeployer constructor. > IOW *you shouldn't introduce additional deployers in AS IL*. You should *do > everything in DAs* and just *leverage the AS IL integration code*. AFAIK, the hornetq deployers create BeanMetaData for queue/topic deployment descriptor and KernalDeploymentDeployer will start/stop these BeanMetaData represents queue/topic created by hornetq deployers. I understood your suggestion : use deployer input to put the JMS DA after the deployer deployed jms destination. In AS5 , we should put JMSDA after the last real stage deployer ServiceDeployer . AS6, we put JMSDA after KernalDeploymentDeployer. IOW, we do not rely on AS deployer frameworks' deployment dependency mechinism , we rely on the deployer order to resolve the deployment dependency. If this is acceptable and if you do not see any other problems , I will follow your suggestion (as your pseudocode shows) to rewrite . -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/541296#541296] Start a new discussion in JBoss Web Services Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2047]
_______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
