James,

Take a few minutes to figure out the build process of jboss.  I felt the 
same way  ("Where's configure and make?"), but all you have to do is 
install ANT and run "build.sh" dist or "build.bat dist"

Bill

Trawick, James wrote:

> I ran into this too.  I've been forced to use the 2.1-beta and tomcat, 
> and have had limited success with it.  I haven't been able to use the 
> non-beta since it isn't available in binary, the CVS repository has a 
> bad habit of rejecting valid anon access, and the build process is far 
> too clumsy for me to take the time to deal with it.  (whatever the 
> hell happened to single distribution and "configure; make; make 
> install"?!  ant is great, but only if there's a real distribution to 
> work with)
> 
>  
> 
> chris
> 
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: Bolt, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>     Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 1:58 PM
>     To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     Subject: [JBoss-user] Difference between JBOSS 2.1 download and 
>     the bundled tomcat dist ribution
>     
>     I have a question on the differences in the binary distributions 
>     that are on the JBoss site for download. The core jar files that 
>     come from the JBOSS 2.1, Tomcat, and Jetty binary distributions 
>     all have different date/time stamps. Where they built from the 
>     same source using a singular build process. I would expect that 
>     the distributions should all have the same date/time stamp for a 
>     given release for the core JAR files that compose JBOSS.
>     
>     Also, the directory structure for the ZIP files seems to be 
>     radically different. Shouldn't the directory structure be similar 
>     independent of the fact that JBOSS is being used alone or 
>     integrated with Tomcat or Jetty.
>     
>     Basically I just want to make sure that if I download JBoss 2.1 
>     bundled with Tomcat that I'm getting the real 2.1 build and not 
>     some beta. Here are the files in the http://www.jboss.org/bin 
>     directory. Three of the files are described as 2.1 builds of 
>     JBoss, but only one file seems to be built off of 2.1
>     
>      jBoss-2.0_FINAL.zip     09-Feb-2001 04:05   4.2M 
>      jboss-2.1.zip           09-Mar-2001 16:59   4.0M 
>      jboss-tomcat-2.1-bet..> 27-Feb-2001 04:05   8.2M  Looks like an 
>     outdated beta
>      jboss_jetty.zip         29-Jan-2001 09:10   7.0M  Looks older 
>     than 2.0 final
>      jboss_tomcat.zip        25-Jan-2001 18:14   8.3M  Looks older 
>     than 2.0 final
>     
>     The web site creates the impresession that the Jetty and Tomcat 
>     bundles are the same as the main 2.1 download and that does not 
>     seem to jive with the files that are actually posted on the site
>     
>     
>     
>     Dave Bolt
>     There is always plenty of bandwidth, just none for you.
>     



_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to