Bill Burke wrote:
>
> same way ("Where's configure and make?"), but all you have to do is
> install ANT and run "build.sh" dist or "build.bat dist"
Actually, you even don't have to install ant - it's included
in jboss source distribution or cvs-checkout. All you have to
do it's to go to .../jboss/src/build and run build.sh or build.bat.
Regards,
>
> Bill
>
> Trawick, James wrote:
>
> > I ran into this too. I've been forced to use the 2.1-beta and tomcat,
> > and have had limited success with it. I haven't been able to use the
> > non-beta since it isn't available in binary, the CVS repository has a
> > bad habit of rejecting valid anon access, and the build process is far
> > too clumsy for me to take the time to deal with it. (whatever the
> > hell happened to single distribution and "configure; make; make
> > install"?! ant is great, but only if there's a real distribution to
> > work with)
> >
> >
> >
> > chris
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bolt, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 1:58 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [JBoss-user] Difference between JBOSS 2.1 download and
> > the bundled tomcat dist ribution
> >
> > I have a question on the differences in the binary distributions
> > that are on the JBoss site for download. The core jar files that
> > come from the JBOSS 2.1, Tomcat, and Jetty binary distributions
> > all have different date/time stamps. Where they built from the
> > same source using a singular build process. I would expect that
> > the distributions should all have the same date/time stamp for a
> > given release for the core JAR files that compose JBOSS.
> >
> > Also, the directory structure for the ZIP files seems to be
> > radically different. Shouldn't the directory structure be similar
> > independent of the fact that JBOSS is being used alone or
> > integrated with Tomcat or Jetty.
> >
> > Basically I just want to make sure that if I download JBoss 2.1
> > bundled with Tomcat that I'm getting the real 2.1 build and not
> > some beta. Here are the files in the http://www.jboss.org/bin
> > directory. Three of the files are described as 2.1 builds of
> > JBoss, but only one file seems to be built off of 2.1
> >
> > jBoss-2.0_FINAL.zip 09-Feb-2001 04:05 4.2M
> > jboss-2.1.zip 09-Mar-2001 16:59 4.0M
> > jboss-tomcat-2.1-bet..> 27-Feb-2001 04:05 8.2M Looks like an
> > outdated beta
> > jboss_jetty.zip 29-Jan-2001 09:10 7.0M Looks older
> > than 2.0 final
> > jboss_tomcat.zip 25-Jan-2001 18:14 8.3M Looks older
> > than 2.0 final
> >
> > The web site creates the impresession that the Jetty and Tomcat
> > bundles are the same as the main 2.1 download and that does not
> > seem to jive with the files that are actually posted on the site
> >
> >
> >
> > Dave Bolt
> > There is always plenty of bandwidth, just none for you.
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
--
__________________________________________________
Alexander Kogan PTC www.ptc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 140 Kendrick St. Needham MA 02494
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
