hey marc,
I appreciate your desire to keep jboss stuff on jboss, however I don't
think you really need to start by attacking people who say they want to
provide information about jboss. Perhaps in the future you could say
something like..
We recognize that the information on jboss is incomplete and not always up
to date. You can best contribute by working on the <x> area of the jboss
project. We want to keep the jboss information on the jboss site for now,
as explained at <link>.
I have read every post to jboss-users and jboss-dev for about 6 months, and
haven't seen anything that looks much like an invitation to contribute
something like what Richard proposed to the jboss site. I think what he
wants to do would be very useful, and I agree it would be best as part of
the jboss site. Why didn't you invite him to add it there? You don't
know, maybe he is the worlds best documentation writer..
david jencks
On 2001.06.26 16:07:14 -0400 marc fleury wrote:
> ALL RIGHT THAT IS ENOUGH...
>
> Whatever you guys are looking for, what saddens me is that you want to
> hop
> on the boat with the first "desconocido" who comes along rather than
> invest
> that energy in the JBoss website and book.
>
> You don't understand that we will compete with efforts like this one. WE
> ARE ALL FOR COMMERCIAL EXPLOITATION. JBoss Group IS A COMMERCIAL
> EXPLOITATION by the developers for the developers, and we hope to grow it
> organically.
>
> I AM FOR COMMERCIAL EXPLOITATION BY OURSELVES. WE will compete with
> "red-hats" that crop up and they will compete with us through JBoss
> Group.
><snip>
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
