I'm using the RC2 and Sun's JDK 1.4.0 on Linux (2.4.18 kernel, fwiw)
and it seems to work well. Startup is relatively slow (1m 30s-2m
depeding on whether I use Jetty or Tomcat on an Athlon 700, 256MB RAM)
which is a PITA when I'm developing, but other than that it's working
like a charm.
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 05:19:46PM -0500, Dan Christopherson wrote:
> Well, since nobody else is answering...
>
> For production, I'd stay with JDK1.3, at the latest bugfix release
> available for your platform. It's relatively recent that JBoss has run
> in 1.4 and I'm not sure how many are using that. Likewise, I haven't
> heard anyone complaining of core dumps, etc. with any 1.3 versions.
>
> my .02$
> -danch
>
> James Higginbotham wrote:
> >JBoss team,
> >
> >
> >
> >After porting our J2EE application from Weblogic to JBoss, I'm finally
> >seeing the light at the end of the proverbial tunnel. I was thinking
> >that since weblogic tends to "recommend" versions of JDK 1.3 to run with
> >their major releases due to better stability and/or performance, what
> >does the JBoss team use for Windows (2000 or XP), Linux, Solaris, et.
> >al? Obviously, most minor versions of the JDK patch bugs, but I've seen
> >issues in the past where a minor version upgrade can distrupt the
> >stability of an appserver. Sad, but true. What are your picks for
> >stability and/or performance from your Q/A group?
Cheers,
Simon
--
In related wibbling, I can see an opening for the four lusers of the
Apocalypse... "I didn't change anything", "My e-mail doesn't work",
"I can't print" and "Is the network broken?".
- Paul Mc Auley
_______________________________________________________________
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
