<joa...@verona.se> writes: > I tried the jdk 9 repl briefly, and it appeared to work as advertized. > > Maybe it could be used in place of bsh, or maybe the Clojure idea is > better, I'm not sure.
I haven't tried it yet -- the installation looks to be a bit of a pain. AFAICT, though, it would be a good replacement for bsh and a step up from the current situation, as bsh is not maintained. Having something build into the JDK is a big plus. At the same time, the clojure route has the advantage of a sane communication layer with the running process. I know that Emacs has communicated through a pipe with processes for a long time, but parsing command line output never seems like a fantastic idea to me. Of course, the two ideas are not necessarily a dichotomy. If we had good connectivity with a clojure process via nrepl, then clojure could also launch a Java REPL process. Depending on the Java REPL API, this should avoid the nastiness of parsing. Phil ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ jdee-devel mailing list jdee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jdee-devel
