What this means is that the W3C can create a recommendation that becomes a defato web standard and any implementation will/may have to pay royalties.
 
For example, SVG implementers would/could have to pay royalties. I rather have no SVG 'Web Standard' then have one where I need IP lawyers to negotiate royalties. If companies want to create open web standards then they should NOT be allowed use the patent system. It either an open web or a closed web owned by companies that can afford to pay big bucks to Intellectual Property lawyers.
 
I wonder what the other Jabber developers think of this proposal from the W3C. 
 
Should the Jabber specifications and any derived work be placed in a 'Patent Free Zone' OR do folks believe that Patents are the foundation of our IP (Intellectual Property) industry.  
 
Regards,
Ashvil
 
 
 

Reply via email to