|
What this means is that the W3C can create a
recommendation that becomes a defato web standard and any implementation
will/may have to pay royalties.
For example, SVG implementers would/could have to
pay royalties. I rather have no SVG 'Web Standard' then have one where I need IP
lawyers to negotiate royalties. If companies want to create open web standards
then they should NOT be allowed use the patent system. It either an open web or
a closed web owned by companies that can afford to pay big bucks to Intellectual
Property lawyers.
I wonder what the other Jabber developers think of
this proposal from the W3C.
Should the Jabber specifications and any derived
work be placed in a 'Patent Free Zone' OR do folks believe that Patents are the
foundation of our IP (Intellectual Property) industry.
Regards,
Ashvil
|
- Re: [JDEV] New Patent Policy at W3C Ashvil
- Re: [JDEV] New Patent Policy at W3C Adam Theo
- Re: [JDEV] New Patent Policy at W3C Ashvil
- Re: [JDEV] New Patent Policy at W3C Scott Cote
- Re: [JDEV] New Patent Policy at W3C Oliver Jones
- Re: [JDEV] New Patent Policy at W3C Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [JDEV] New Patent Policy at W3C Dave Waite
- Re: [JDEV] New Patent Policy at W3C Ashvil
- Re: [JDEV] New Patent Policy at W3C Ashvil
- Re: [JDEV] New Patent Policy at W3C Peter Saint-Andre
