|
There were some good responses to the new W3C
patent policy.
The W3C has put out a new reponse
Oliver Jones wrote:
> W3C is trying to prevent the element of surprise--a submarine patent
surfacing and its owner demanding payment after standardization. This is
an entirely good goal, I think.
I agree 100% that submarine patents are bad and any
attempt to eliminate them will be good. But reading the document I am not
very clear if what happens when a company finds that it has a patent relating
a royalty free standard. It seems that the company then has to license
the patents under RAND terms and NOT royalty free
terms.
Oliver Jones wrote: > Strangely enough, the GNU Public License does NOT include explicit
permission to actually USE the software it covers, only to copy and make
derivative works of it. I fear this omission in the GPL is going to be
crucial in resolving some upcoming patent litigation (see www.freedb.org).
Please explain.
Regards,
Ashvil
|
- [JDEV] New Patent Policy at W3C Ashvil
- Re: [JDEV] New Patent Policy at W3C Adam Theo
- Re: [JDEV] New Patent Policy at W3C Ashvil
- Re: [JDEV] New Patent Policy at W3C Scott Cote
- Re: [JDEV] New Patent Policy at W3C Oliver Jones
- Re: [JDEV] New Patent Policy at W3C Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [JDEV] New Patent Policy at W3C Dave Waite
- Re: [JDEV] New Patent Policy at W3C Ashvil
- Re: [JDEV] New Patent Policy at W3C Ashvil
- Re: [JDEV] New Patent Policy at W3C Peter Saint-Andre
