There were some good responses to the new W3C patent policy.
 
The W3C has put out a new reponse
 
Oliver Jones wrote:
> W3C is trying to prevent the element of surprise--a submarine patent surfacing and its owner demanding payment after standardization.  This is an entirely good goal, I think.
I agree 100% that submarine patents are bad and any attempt to eliminate them will be good. But reading the document I am not very clear if what happens when a company finds that it has a patent relating a royalty free standard. It seems that the company then has to license the patents under RAND terms and NOT royalty free terms.   
Oliver Jones wrote:
> Strangely enough, the GNU Public License does NOT include explicit permission to actually USE the software it covers, only to copy and make derivative works of it.  I fear this omission in the GPL is going to be crucial in resolving some upcoming patent litigation (see www.freedb.org).
Please explain.
Regards,
Ashvil
 
 

Reply via email to