Tijl Houtbeckers wrote:
"Michael Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 16-6-2003 15:39:42:
If I make a portal and choose an official client for it (and call itSure. Your website - you get to choose whatever client you like. Why would I have a problem with that? I think you misunderstand me...
exactly that), there's nothing you can do about it. It's very
unfortunate if that would piss you off (for you), but I don't see any
reason why it should upset you in the first place? The choice of client in Jabber is not limited to the end-user. The provider of the server has the same right of choosing a client. And yes, it can go hand in hand with promotion of Jabber. Tipic comes to mind as an example.
Rachel Blackman writes for example:
On my server Psi is the "official client". There are downloads that bundle Psi with fitting SSL certificates for this server, with localization resources and some additional icons. There is a small introduction on how to set up Psi. So, "Psi" is the "official client" for jabber.fsinf.de, if you like to say so. Most users of this server use Psi and seem satisfied.This is exactly the sort of example I meant in terms of an 'official
client'. It doesn't have to be for all of Jabber, just for whatever this system is.
You respond to this:
"Michael Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 16-6-2003 15:39:42:
Rachel - seriously, drop the term "Official Client" - please. That is really going to start pissing off other client developers (starting with me).
Maybe you're the one who is misunderstanding something?
_______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
