Tijl Houtbeckers wrote:[...]
There's no need for 1 big "JSF-thumbs-up" portal that can't focus on the end-user cause it might piss off some developers.
I would still go for a *framework*-project so people can easily set up a localized site (and it's more in the line of the Jabber philosofy: distributed). Because one big "JSF-thumbs-up" will be in English... not every user understands English very well. And I don't think the JSF has the bandwith to provide http://be.jabber.net, http://nl.jabber.net, http://ro.jabber.net,... And that framework project doesn't have to focus on "content", but much more on "logic" and a framework to *provide* presentation (the project shouldn't worry to much on the presentation itself).
Why a framework? Well, why has the Jabber community so much servers? Because you can just download jabberd, install it on a linux server and that's it, nothing more. You customize it yourself by installing some components.
Why would end-user sites pop-up as mushrooms? Because they would have a framework, to easily set up a site on their own.
just my 0.5 cents (again :)) greetings, Mattias
_______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
