Op vrijdag 13 mei 2005 16:25, schreef Daniel Henninger: <snip> > As a client developer, I must say that I wouldn't be insulted or find it > unfair if there was a "chosen" client (that was not mine). =) Take gaim > for example, lots of people live and breath by gaim, but if you go to > AIM's site you won't find it listed there. Instead, you'll be pointed a > the official AIM client. I know that's a somewhat different scenario, but > I did want to point out that I don't think it's unfair to pick a > particular client to be the "preferred" client. I don't think it's going > to stop anyone from writing their own. =D
You can't compare AIM, a company, with the JSF, an organisation promoting an open technology. To me it seems simple: 1) The JSF should promote the clients that support the Jabber/XMPP protocols the best. This can be more than one client, and this will be no fixed list. 2) A company providing Jabber services for example can do the same promoting strategy for its own Jabber client like AIM does. > Besides, in a way Jabberd1 and > Jabberd2 have the "aura" that they are the preferred servers, Wasn't ejabberd the preferred server? ;-) > but I don't > think that really upsets the other server writers. Granted, that's just > my opinion, I can't speak for anyone else. =D -- Mvg, Sander Devrieze. xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( http://jabber.tk/ )
pgp9v2tByhBV0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
